Suzuki Vitara 1988 vs Lada NIVA (2121) 1977
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Suzuki Vitara is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Lada NIVA (2121) is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 1.3 - 1.9 (petrol) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Suzuki Vitara is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 - 136 HP | 64 - 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 - 216 NM | 92 - 128 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 - 19.8 seconds | 19 - 26 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 - 10.9 | 8.7 - 13.1 | |
|
Suzuki Vitara petrol engines consumes on average 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Lada NIVA (2121). This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.02 m | 3.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.67 m | |
| Suzuki Vitara is 19 cm longer than the Lada NIVA (2121), width is practically the same , while the height of Suzuki Vitara is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 580 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1300 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`844 | ~ 1`671 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Vitara has
|
Lada NIVA (2121) has
| |