Suzuki Splash 2012 vs Nissan Micra 2011
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 94 HP | 80 HP | |
Torque: | 118 NM | 110 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 14.5 seconds | |
Suzuki Splash is more dynamic to drive. Suzuki Splash engine produces 14 HP more power than Nissan Micra, whereas torque is 8 NM more than Nissan Micra. Thanks to more power Suzuki Splash reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 5.4 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
The Nissan Micra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Splash consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Splash could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Splash consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 41 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
900 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
650 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 350'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Suzuki Splash engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 12 years | 15 years | |
Engine spread: | Used also on Opel Agila | Used also on Nissan Note | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Micra might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.78 m | 3.78 m | |
Width: | 1.68 m | 1.67 m | |
Height: | 1.59 m | 1.52 m | |
Suzuki Splash and Nissan Micra are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 178 litres | 265 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
573 litres | 1132 litres | |
Nissan Micra has more luggage space. Suzuki Splash has 87 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Micra. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Micra (by 559 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 9.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the Suzuki Splash is 0.1 metres more than that of the Nissan Micra. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`485 | 1`425 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | high | average | |
Suzuki Splash has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Micra has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Suzuki Splash, so Suzuki Splash quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | no data | 4400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Splash has
|
Nissan Micra has
| |