Suzuki Splash 2010 vs Mazda 2 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 94 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 114 NM | 121 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Splash is more dynamic to drive. Suzuki Splash engine produces 19 HP more power than Mazda 2, but torque is 7 NM less than Mazda 2. Thanks to more power Suzuki Splash reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Splash is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Splash consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that by driving the Suzuki Splash over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Splash consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 43 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki Splash gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Suzuki Splash engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Opel Agila | Used also on Mazda 3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.72 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Suzuki Splash is smaller, but higher. Suzuki Splash is 19 cm shorter than the Mazda 2, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Splash is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 178 litres | 250 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1050 litres | 787 litres | |
| Suzuki Splash has 72 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki Splash (by 263 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Splash is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mazda 2, which means Suzuki Splash can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`485 | 1`480 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Splash has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Splash has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |