Suzuki Splash 2010 vs Mazda 2 2007

 
Suzuki Splash
2010 - 2012
Mazda 2
2007 - 2010
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 1.2 Petrol1.3 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 94 HP75 HP
Torque: 114 NM121 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14 seconds14 seconds
Suzuki Splash engine produces 19 HP more power than Mazda 2, but torque is 7 NM less than Mazda 2.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.75.4
Real fuel consumption: 6.9 l/100km6.4 l/100km
The Mazda 2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Suzuki Splash consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Splash could require 45 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Splash consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres43 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 780 km in combined cycle790 km in combined cycle
900 km on highway930 km on highway
650 km with real consumption670 km with real consumption

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 390'000 km330'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Suzuki Splash engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 12 years13 years
Engine spread: Used also on Opel AgilaUsed also on Mazda 3
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 3.72 m3.90 m
Width: 1.68 m1.70 m
Height: 1.59 m1.48 m
Suzuki Splash is smaller, but higher.
Suzuki Splash is 19 cm shorter than the Mazda 2, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Splash is 11 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 178 litres250 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1050 litres787 litres
Suzuki Splash has 72 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki Splash (by 263 litres).
Turning diameter: 9.4 meters9.8 meters
The turning circle of the Suzuki Splash is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mazda 2, which means Suzuki Splash can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`4851`480
Safety:
Quality:
average

high
Mazda 2 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Splash has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): no data2400
Pros and Cons: Suzuki Splash has
  • more power
  • longer expected engine lifespan
Mazda 2 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • higher safety
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv