Suzuki Splash 2008 vs Ford KA 2008

 
Suzuki Splash
2008 - 2012
Ford KA
2008 - 2015
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.0 Petrol1.2 Petrol

Performance

Power: 65 HP69 HP
Torque: 90 NM102 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.7 seconds13.1 seconds
Ford KA is a more dynamic driving.
Suzuki Splash engine produces 4 HP less power than Ford KA, whereas torque is 12 NM less than Ford KA. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Splash reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.05.1
Real fuel consumption: 6.0 l/100km6.3 l/100km
The Suzuki Splash is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Suzuki Splash consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford KA, which means that by driving the Suzuki Splash over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Splash consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford KA.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres35 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 900 km in combined cycle680 km in combined cycle
1020 km on highway790 km on highway
750 km with real consumption550 km with real consumption
Suzuki Splash gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.72 m3.62 m
Width: 1.68 m1.66 m
Height: 1.59 m1.51 m
Suzuki Splash is larger.
Suzuki Splash is 10 cm longer than the Ford KA, 2 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Splash is 9 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 178 litres224 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1050 litres710 litres
Despite its longer length, Suzuki Splash has 46 litres less trunk space than the Ford KA. This could mean that the Suzuki Splash uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki Splash (by 340 litres).
Turning diameter: 9.4 meters9.3 meters
The turning circle of the Suzuki Splash is 0.1 metres more than that of the Ford KA.
Power steering: Hydraulic power steeringElectric power steering
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering.
Gross weight (kg): 1`4851`320
Safety:
Quality:
high

low
Suzuki Splash has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford KA has serious deffects in 165 percent more cases than Suzuki Splash, so Suzuki Splash quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): no data2200
Pros and Cons: Suzuki Splash has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • hydraulic power steering
  • fewer faults
Ford KA has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • electric power steering
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv