Suzuki Splash 2012 vs Volkswagen Polo 2009

 
Suzuki Splash
2012 - 2014
Volkswagen Polo
2009 - 2014
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.0 Petrol1.2 Petrol

Performance

Power: 68 HP60 HP
Torque: 90 NM108 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.7 seconds16.1 seconds
Suzuki Splash is more dynamic to drive.
Suzuki Splash engine produces 8 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo, but torque is 18 NM less than Volkswagen Polo. Thanks to more power Suzuki Splash reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.75.5
Real fuel consumption: 5.9 l/100km6.5 l/100km
The Suzuki Splash is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Suzuki Splash consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that by driving the Suzuki Splash over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Splash consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 950 km in combined cycle810 km in combined cycle
1070 km on highway1000 km on highway
760 km with real consumption690 km with real consumption
Suzuki Splash gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.78 m3.97 m
Width: 1.68 m1.68 m
Height: 1.59 m1.49 m
Suzuki Splash is smaller, but higher.
Suzuki Splash is 20 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Polo, width is practically the same , while the height of Suzuki Splash is 11 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 202 litres280 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
573 litres952 litres
Volkswagen Polo has more luggage space.
Suzuki Splash has 78 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 379 litres).
Turning diameter: 9.4 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 1`4851`550
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

above average
Suzuki Splash has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Polo has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Suzuki Splash, so Suzuki Splash quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): no data4400
Pros and Cons: Suzuki Splash has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
Volkswagen Polo has
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv