Suzuki Splash 2012 vs Volkswagen Polo 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.2 (petrol) | 1.2 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 94 HP | 60 - 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 90 - 118 NM | 108 - 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 - 14.7 seconds | 10.4 - 16.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 - 5.7 | 4.2 - 5.9 | |
|
Suzuki Splash petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Polo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.78 m | 3.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Suzuki Splash is smaller, but higher. Suzuki Splash is 20 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Polo, width is practically the same , while the height of Suzuki Splash is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 202 litres | 280 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
573 litres | 952 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Polo has more luggage space. Suzuki Splash has 78 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 379 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Splash is 1.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Suzuki Splash can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`485 | ~ 1`570 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Splash has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |