Suzuki Samurai 1992 vs Mitsubishi L 200 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Suzuki Samurai) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Mitsubishi L 200) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 64 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 100 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Suzuki Samurai engine produces 36 HP less power than Mitsubishi L 200, whereas torque is 140 NM less than Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 75 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.44 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.53 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.57 m | |
|
Suzuki Samurai is smaller, but higher. Suzuki Samurai is 106 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi L 200, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Samurai is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`330 | 2`835 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |