Suzuki Samurai 1992 vs Mercedes ML 1998
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 64 HP | 218 HP | |
Torque: | 100 NM | 310 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
Suzuki Samurai engine produces 154 HP less power than Mercedes ML, whereas torque is 210 NM less than Mercedes ML. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 13.8 | |
The Suzuki Samurai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Samurai consumes 5.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML, which means that by driving the Suzuki Samurai over 15,000 km in a year you can save 825 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 72 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 480 km in combined cycle | 520 km in combined cycle | |
490 km on highway | 640 km on highway | ||
Mercedes ML gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.44 m | 4.59 m | |
Width: | 1.53 m | 1.83 m | |
Height: | 1.67 m | 1.78 m | |
Suzuki Samurai is smaller. Suzuki Samurai is 115 cm shorter than the Mercedes ML, 30 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Samurai is 12 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`330 | 2`650 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 6800 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Samurai has
|
Mercedes ML has
| |