Suzuki Samurai 1992 vs Lexus RX 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 64 HP | 201 HP | |
| Torque: | 100 NM | 283 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
| Suzuki Samurai engine produces 137 HP less power than Lexus RX, whereas torque is 183 NM less than Lexus RX. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 13.0 | |
|
The Suzuki Samurai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Samurai consumes 4.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Lexus RX, which means that by driving the Suzuki Samurai over 15,000 km in a year you can save 705 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 73 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 480 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 490 km on highway | 700 km on highway | ||
| Lexus RX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.44 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.53 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Suzuki Samurai is smaller, but slightly higher. Suzuki Samurai is 114 cm shorter than the Lexus RX, 29 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 489 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1725 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`330 | 2`270 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Samurai has
|
Lexus RX has
| |