Suzuki Samurai 1992 vs Jeep Wrangler 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 64 HP | 118 HP | |
| Torque: | 100 NM | 186 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 14.1 seconds | |
| Suzuki Samurai engine produces 54 HP less power than Jeep Wrangler, whereas torque is 86 NM less than Jeep Wrangler. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 11.6 | |
|
The Suzuki Samurai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Samurai consumes 3.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Wrangler, which means that by driving the Suzuki Samurai over 15,000 km in a year you can save 495 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 72 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 480 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 490 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Wrangler gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.44 m | 3.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.53 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Suzuki Samurai is smaller. Suzuki Samurai is 44 cm shorter than the Jeep Wrangler, 21 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Samurai is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 315 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1515 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.2 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`330 kg | 1`925 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7800 | 12 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Samurai has
|
Jeep Wrangler has
| |