Suzuki SX4 2016 vs Peugeot 2008 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Suzuki SX4) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Peugeot 2008) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 2008 is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki SX4 engine produces 10 HP less power than Peugeot 2008, but torque is 90 NM more than Peugeot 2008. Due to the lower power, Suzuki SX4 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 6.0 | |
| Suzuki SX4 consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 2008, which means that by driving the Suzuki SX4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 41 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 1110 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| Suzuki SX4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Opel Corsa, Peugeot 308, Opel Combo, Peugeot 3008, Citroen C4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 2008 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Suzuki SX4 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Peugeot 2008 2019 1.2 engine: Since the timing belt is immersed in oil, it doesn't last the intended 180,000 kilometers, and its wear products clog the oilways. First years of engines have been recalled due to excessive axial play in the ... More about Peugeot 2008 2019 1.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.53 m | |
| Suzuki SX4 and Peugeot 2008 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 405 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1269 litres | 1467 litres | |
| Suzuki SX4 has 25 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 2008. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 2008 (by 198 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`860 | 1`752 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Suzuki SX4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 2008 has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Suzuki SX4, so Suzuki SX4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 15 000 | 22 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki SX4 has
|
Peugeot 2008 has
| |