Suzuki SX4 2016 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki SX4 engine produces 30 HP less power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Mitsubishi ASX. Due to the lower power, Suzuki SX4 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 5.8 | |
|
The Suzuki SX4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki SX4 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that by driving the Suzuki SX4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1110 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi ASX engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi L 200 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi ASX might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Suzuki SX4 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Suzuki SX4 is smaller. Suzuki SX4 is 6 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki SX4 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 419 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1269 litres | 1219 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Suzuki SX4 has 11 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The Mitsubishi ASX may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki SX4 (by 50 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki SX4 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`860 | 2`060 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki SX4 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 13 400 | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki SX4 has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |