Suzuki SX4 2016 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki SX4 engine produces 30 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Due to the lower power, Suzuki SX4 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 60 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Suzuki SX4 is smaller. Suzuki SX4 is 6 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki SX4 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1269 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage space. Suzuki SX4 has 120 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki SX4 is 0.9 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means Suzuki SX4 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`860 | 2`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 600 | 21 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki SX4 has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |