Suzuki SX4 2013 vs Nissan Juke 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Suzuki SX4 engine produces 10 HP more power than Nissan Juke, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Nissan Juke. Despite the higher power, Suzuki SX4 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.5 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki SX4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki SX4 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke, which means that by driving the Suzuki SX4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki SX4 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 1170 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki SX4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Juke might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Suzuki SX4 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Nissan Juke 2010 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Nissan Juke 2010 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.58 m | 1.57 m | |
| Suzuki SX4 is 17 cm longer than the Nissan Juke, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1269 litres | 830 litres | |
|
Suzuki SX4 has more luggage capacity. Suzuki SX4 has 179 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Juke. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki SX4 (by 439 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | 1`750 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Suzuki SX4 scores higher in safety tests. The Suzuki SX4 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | low | |
| Suzuki SX4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 180 percent more cases than Suzuki SX4, so Suzuki SX4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki SX4 has
|
Nissan Juke has
| |