Suzuki SX4 2010 vs Skoda Yeti 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Skoda Yeti is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki SX4 engine produces 20 HP less power than Skoda Yeti, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Skoda Yeti. Due to the lower power, Suzuki SX4 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.3 | |
| Suzuki SX4 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Yeti, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki SX4 could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| Skoda Yeti gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.15 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Suzuki SX4 is smaller. Suzuki SX4 is 7 cm shorter than the Skoda Yeti, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki SX4 is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 322 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1665 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki SX4 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Skoda Yeti, which means Suzuki SX4 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`790 kg | 2`130 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`325 kg | 1`560 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 465 kg | 570 kg | |
| Suzuki SX4 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 23 procentiem less than Skoda Yeti. Therefore, Skoda Yeti is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Skoda Yeti has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki SX4 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Skoda Yeti, so Skoda Yeti quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki SX4 has
|
Skoda Yeti has
| |