Suzuki SX4 2010 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2010
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 120 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 280 NM | 300 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 10 seconds | |
Mitsubishi ASX is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki SX4 engine produces 30 HP less power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Mitsubishi ASX. Due to the lower power, Suzuki SX4 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 5.7 | |
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki SX4 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki SX4 could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 63 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 1100 km in combined cycle | |
890 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.15 m | 4.30 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.62 m | 1.62 m | |
Suzuki SX4 is smaller, but slightly higher. Suzuki SX4 is 15 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 419 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1219 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`790 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | high | |
Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki SX4 has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 3800 | 6000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki SX4 has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |