Suzuki SX4 2006 vs Honda CR-V 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
| Suzuki SX4 engine produces 60 HP less power than Honda CR-V, but torque is 25 NM more than Honda CR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 9.0 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 58 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2004: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 2 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V, Honda Stream | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda CR-V might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Suzuki SX4 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2004 2.0 engine: In 2001, Honda introduced the K-series engine lineup, featuring an aluminum block with an open-deck design and cast-iron cylinder liners. It utilizes a port fuel injection system, a 16-valve aluminum cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, individual ignition coils, a VTC cam ... More about Honda CR-V 2004 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Suzuki SX4 is smaller. Suzuki SX4 is 54 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki SX4 is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 527 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1045 litres | 952 litres | |
| Suzuki SX4 has 257 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki SX4 (by 93 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki SX4 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`650 | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Suzuki SX4 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Honda CR-V, so Suzuki SX4 quality could be a bit better. | ||
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Honda CR-V has
| |