Suzuki SX4 2016 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 156 NM | 197 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Suzuki SX4 engine produces 33 HP less power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 41 NM less than Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.7 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 60 litres | |
| Ground clearance: | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | 195 mm (7.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi ASX can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mitsubishi ASX version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Mitsubishi ASX 2012 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 24 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Swift, Suzuki Liana, Suzuki Vitara | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander, Peugeot 4008 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki SX4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Suzuki SX4 2016 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality.
High engine timing chain lifetime.
Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Suzuki SX4 is larger, but slightly lower. Suzuki SX4 and Mitsubishi ASX are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 384 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1269 litres | 1219 litres | |
|
Suzuki SX4 has more luggage capacity. Suzuki SX4 has 46 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki SX4 (by 50 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki SX4 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`720 | 1`970 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki SX4 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 15 000 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki SX4 has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |