Suzuki SX4 2016 vs Honda HR-V 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 155 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Suzuki SX4 is more dynamic to drive. Suzuki SX4 engine produces 10 HP more power than Honda HR-V, whereas torque is 65 NM more than Honda HR-V. Thanks to more power Suzuki SX4 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 5.6 | |
| Suzuki SX4 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda HR-V, which means that by driving the Suzuki SX4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Suzuki SX4 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Suzuki SX4 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from five 4x4 versions of Suzuki SX4 2016 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Swift, Suzuki Vitara | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki SX4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Suzuki SX4 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Suzuki SX4 2016 1.4 engine: The K14C Boosterjet engine is equipped with a turbocharging system that enhances air intake, providing excellent torque as early as 1,500 RPM.
However, the direct injection system contributes to carbon ... More about Suzuki SX4 2016 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.61 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Suzuki SX4 and Honda HR-V are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 431 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1269 litres | 1456 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki SX4 is 1 metres less than that of the Honda HR-V, which means Suzuki SX4 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`730 kg | 1`790 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`150 kg | 1`312 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 580 kg | 478 kg | |
| Suzuki SX4 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 18 procentiem more than Honda HR-V. Therefore, Suzuki SX4 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 200 | 14 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki SX4 has
|
Honda HR-V has
| |