Suzuki SX4 2006 vs Honda CR-V 2004
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 120 HP | 140 HP | |
Torque: | 280 NM | 340 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki SX4 engine produces 20 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Suzuki SX4 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.7 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
The Suzuki SX4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki SX4 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Suzuki SX4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki SX4 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 58 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
740 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Honda CR-V 2004 2.2 engine: Honda’s first diesel engine featured an aluminum block, a variable-geometry turbocharger, second-generation Bosch Common Rail injection, 16-valve cylinder head, and a balance shaft integrated into the crankcase. The ... More about Honda CR-V 2004 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.10 m | 4.64 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.62 m | 1.71 m | |
Suzuki SX4 is smaller. Suzuki SX4 is 54 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki SX4 is 9 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 525 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1045 litres | 952 litres | |
Suzuki SX4 has 255 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki SX4 (by 93 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`650 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | Suzuki SX4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda CR-V has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Suzuki SX4, so Suzuki SX4 quality is probably significantly better | ||
Average price (€): | 3200 | 2600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki SX4 has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |