Suzuki SX4 2006 vs Toyota Urban Cruiser 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 107 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 132 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Suzuki SX4 is more dynamic to drive. Suzuki SX4 engine produces 7 HP more power than Toyota Urban Cruiser, whereas torque is 13 NM more than Toyota Urban Cruiser. Thanks to more power Suzuki SX4 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Urban Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki SX4 consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Urban Cruiser, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki SX4 could require 240 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki SX4 consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Urban Cruiser. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 630 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 24 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Swift, Suzuki Liana, Suzuki Vitara | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Corolla, Toyota Auris, Toyota Yaris, Toyota Verso, Toyota iQ | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota Urban Cruiser engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Suzuki SX4 2006 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality.
High engine timing chain lifetime.
Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur. Toyota Urban Cruiser 2008 1.3 engine: The engine is known for its reliability but exhibits several common issues, especially as mileage increases. Owners report minor oil consumption, which tends to grow over time due to piston ring coking. Individual ignition ... More about Toyota Urban Cruiser 2008 1.3 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.16 m | 3.93 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Suzuki SX4 is larger. Suzuki SX4 is 23 cm longer than the Toyota Urban Cruiser, 4 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki SX4 is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 314 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1045 litres | no data | |
|
Toyota Urban Cruiser has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Suzuki SX4 has 44 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Urban Cruiser. This could mean that the Suzuki SX4 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`670 | 1`590 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki SX4 has
|
Toyota Urban Cruiser has
| |