Suzuki SX4 2006 vs Hyundai Tucson 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 107 HP | 141 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 184 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Tucson is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki SX4 engine produces 34 HP less power than Hyundai Tucson, whereas torque is 39 NM less than Hyundai Tucson. Due to the lower power, Suzuki SX4 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 8.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 10.3 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki SX4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki SX4 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson, which means that by driving the Suzuki SX4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki SX4 consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 24 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Swift, Suzuki Liana, Suzuki Vitara | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Elantra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Suzuki SX4 2006 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality.
High engine timing chain lifetime.
Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur. Hyundai Tucson 2004 2.0 engine: Relatively reliable engine with a large resource. Can have inherent vibrations and is noisier than a typical petrol engine. Spare parts widely available. May have problems with ignition system and temperature ... More about Hyundai Tucson 2004 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.16 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Suzuki SX4 is smaller. Suzuki SX4 is 16 cm shorter than the Hyundai Tucson, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki SX4 is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 644 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1045 litres | no data | |
|
Hyundai Tucson has more luggage space. Suzuki SX4 has 374 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Tucson. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki SX4 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Hyundai Tucson. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`670 | 2`140 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Suzuki SX4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Tucson has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Suzuki SX4, so Suzuki SX4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki SX4 has
|
Hyundai Tucson has
| |