Suzuki SX4 2006 vs Honda CR-V 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 107 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki SX4 engine produces 43 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 45 NM less than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Suzuki SX4 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 9.3 | |
|
The Suzuki SX4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki SX4 consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Suzuki SX4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2004: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 24 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Swift, Suzuki Liana, Suzuki Vitara | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V, Honda Stream | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki SX4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Suzuki SX4 2006 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality.
High engine timing chain lifetime.
Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur. Honda CR-V 2004 2.0 engine: In 2001, Honda introduced the K-series engine lineup, featuring an aluminum block with an open-deck design and cast-iron cylinder liners. It utilizes a port fuel injection system, a 16-valve aluminum cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, individual ignition coils, a VTC cam ... More about Honda CR-V 2004 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Suzuki SX4 is smaller. Suzuki SX4 is 54 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki SX4 is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1045 litres | 952 litres | |
| Suzuki SX4 has 255 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki SX4 (by 93 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki SX4 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`650 | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Suzuki SX4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda CR-V has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Suzuki SX4, so Suzuki SX4 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki SX4 has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |