Suzuki SX4 2006 vs Honda CR-V 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 99 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 133 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki SX4 engine produces 51 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 57 NM less than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Suzuki SX4 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 9.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 10.0 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki SX4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki SX4 consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Suzuki SX4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki SX4 consumes 3.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki SX4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2004: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Swift, Suzuki Ignis | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V, Honda Stream | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2004 2.0 engine: In 2001, Honda introduced the K-series engine lineup, featuring an aluminum block with an open-deck design and cast-iron cylinder liners. It utilizes a port fuel injection system, a 16-valve aluminum cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, individual ignition coils, a VTC cam ... More about Honda CR-V 2004 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Suzuki SX4 is smaller. Suzuki SX4 is 54 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki SX4 is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 527 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1045 litres | 952 litres | |
| Suzuki SX4 has 257 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki SX4 (by 93 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki SX4 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`650 | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Suzuki SX4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda CR-V has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Suzuki SX4, so Suzuki SX4 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki SX4 has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |