Suzuki SX4 2006 vs Skoda Yeti 2009
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Petrol engines (Suzuki SX4) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Skoda Yeti) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 99 HP | 140 HP | |
Torque: | 133 NM | 350 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
Skoda Yeti is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki SX4 engine produces 41 HP less power than Skoda Yeti, whereas torque is 217 NM less than Skoda Yeti. Due to the lower power, Suzuki SX4 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | no data | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
730 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.10 m | 4.22 m | |
Width: | 1.73 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.56 m | 1.69 m | |
Suzuki SX4 is smaller. Suzuki SX4 is 12 cm shorter than the Skoda Yeti, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki SX4 is 13 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1045 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`650 | no data | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | below average | above average | |
Skoda Yeti has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki SX4 has serious deffects in 115 percent more cases than Skoda Yeti, so Skoda Yeti quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 3200 | 6600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki SX4 has
|
Skoda Yeti has
| |