Suzuki SX4 2010 vs Nissan Juke 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 156 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki SX4 engine produces 70 HP less power than Nissan Juke, whereas torque is 84 NM less than Nissan Juke. Due to the lower power, Suzuki SX4 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 7.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 10.2 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki SX4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki SX4 consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke, which means that by driving the Suzuki SX4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki SX4 consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 450 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki SX4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 24 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Swift, Suzuki Liana, Suzuki Vitara | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Pulsar | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki SX4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Suzuki SX4 2010 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality.
High engine timing chain lifetime.
Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.15 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.57 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Suzuki SX4 is 2 cm longer than the Nissan Juke, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 251 litres | |
| Suzuki SX4 has 19 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Juke. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki SX4 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Nissan Juke. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`650 | 1`860 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Suzuki SX4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Suzuki SX4, so Suzuki SX4 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki SX4 has
|
Nissan Juke has
| |