Suzuki SX4 2010 vs Nissan Juke 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 214 HP | |
| Torque: | 156 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 8 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki SX4 engine produces 94 HP less power than Nissan Juke, whereas torque is 94 NM less than Nissan Juke. Due to the lower power, Suzuki SX4 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 7.4 | |
|
The Suzuki SX4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki SX4 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke, which means that by driving the Suzuki SX4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| Suzuki SX4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 25 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Swift, Suzuki Liana, Suzuki Vitara | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Pulsar | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki SX4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Suzuki SX4 2010 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality.
High engine timing chain lifetime.
Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.15 m | 4.17 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.57 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Suzuki SX4 is 2 cm shorter than the Nissan Juke, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 207 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 786 litres | |
|
Suzuki SX4 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Suzuki SX4 has 63 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Juke. The Nissan Juke may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki SX4 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Nissan Juke. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`650 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Nissan Juke has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki SX4 has serious deffects in 295 percent more cases than Nissan Juke, so Nissan Juke quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 8800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki SX4 has
|
Nissan Juke has
| |