Suzuki SX4 2010 vs Nissan Qashqai 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 156 NM | 156 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Suzuki SX4 is more dynamic to drive. Suzuki SX4 engine produces 5 HP more power than Nissan Qashqai, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Suzuki SX4 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
By specification Suzuki SX4 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that by driving the Suzuki SX4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Suzuki SX4 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 24 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Swift, Suzuki Liana, Suzuki Vitara | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Nissan Almera, Nissan Juke, Nissan Note, Nissan Micra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Suzuki SX4 2010 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality.
High engine timing chain lifetime.
Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur. Nissan Qashqai 2010 1.6 engine: A simple and reliable engine, not particularly demanding on fuel quality. Tends to consume more oil, may have problems starting in cold weather. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.15 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Suzuki SX4 is smaller. Suzuki SX4 is 18 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki SX4 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1513 litres | |
|
Nissan Qashqai has more luggage space. Suzuki SX4 has 140 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`650 | 1`830 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Suzuki SX4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Suzuki SX4, so Suzuki SX4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki SX4 has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |