Suzuki SX4 2010 vs Chevrolet Trax 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 156 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Trax is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki SX4 engine produces 20 HP less power than Chevrolet Trax, whereas torque is 44 NM less than Chevrolet Trax. Due to the lower power, Suzuki SX4 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Suzuki SX4 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Trax, which means that by driving the Suzuki SX4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki SX4 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Trax. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 25 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Swift, Suzuki Liana, Suzuki Vitara | Used also on Chevrolet Cruze | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki SX4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Chevrolet Trax engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Suzuki SX4 2010 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality.
High engine timing chain lifetime.
Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.15 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Suzuki SX4 is smaller. Suzuki SX4 is 10 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Trax, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki SX4 is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 356 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 785 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Trax has more luggage space. Suzuki SX4 has 86 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Trax. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki SX4 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Trax. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`650 kg | 1`884 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`200 kg | 1`380 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 450 kg | 504 kg | |
| Suzuki SX4 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 12 procentiem less than Chevrolet Trax. Therefore, Chevrolet Trax is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki SX4 has
|
Chevrolet Trax has
| |