Suzuki SX4 2013 vs Ford EcoSport 2015

 
Suzuki SX4
2013 - 2016
Ford EcoSport
2015 - 2017
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Diesel1.5 Diesel

Performance

Power: 120 HP95 HP
Torque: 320 NM215 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12 seconds14 seconds
Suzuki SX4 is more dynamic to drive.
Suzuki SX4 engine produces 25 HP more power than Ford EcoSport, whereas torque is 105 NM more than Ford EcoSport. Thanks to more power Suzuki SX4 reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.24.4
Real fuel consumption: 5.0 l/100km6.1 l/100km
The Suzuki SX4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Suzuki SX4 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford EcoSport, which means that by driving the Suzuki SX4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki SX4 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford EcoSport.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres52 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1190 km in combined cycle1180 km in combined cycle
1350 km on highway1200 km on highway
1000 km with real consumption850 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.30 m4.27 m
Width: 1.77 m1.77 m
Height: 1.58 m1.65 m
Suzuki SX4 is 3 cm longer than the Ford EcoSport, width is practically the same , while the height of Suzuki SX4 is 8 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 430 litres333 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1269 litres1238 litres
Suzuki SX4 has more luggage capacity.
Suzuki SX4 has 97 litres more trunk space than the Ford EcoSport. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki SX4 (by 31 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`8701`760
Safety:
Suzuki SX4 scores higher in safety tests. The Suzuki SX4 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
above average

above average
Average price (€): 920010 400
Pros and Cons: Suzuki SX4 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • higher safety
  • better safety assist technologies
  • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv