Suzuki SX4 2013 vs Nissan Juke 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 156 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki SX4 engine produces 73 HP less power than Nissan Juke, whereas torque is 84 NM less than Nissan Juke. Due to the lower power, Suzuki SX4 reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 7.6 | |
|
The Suzuki SX4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki SX4 consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke, which means that by driving the Suzuki SX4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| Suzuki SX4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 24 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Swift, Suzuki Liana, Suzuki Vitara | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Pulsar | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki SX4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Suzuki SX4 2013 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality.
High engine timing chain lifetime.
Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.57 m | |
| Suzuki SX4 is 17 cm longer than the Nissan Juke, width is practically the same , while the height of Suzuki SX4 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1269 litres | no data | |
|
Suzuki SX4 has more luggage capacity. Suzuki SX4 has 179 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Juke. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki SX4 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Nissan Juke. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`740 | 1`860 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Suzuki SX4 scores higher in safety tests. The Suzuki SX4 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | low | |
| Suzuki SX4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 180 percent more cases than Suzuki SX4, so Suzuki SX4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki SX4 has
|
Nissan Juke has
| |