Suzuki SX4 2013 vs Honda CR-V 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 156 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
| Suzuki SX4 engine produces 33 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 34 NM less than Honda CR-V. Despite less power, Suzuki SX4 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 7.7 | |
|
The Suzuki SX4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki SX4 consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Suzuki SX4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 330 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| Suzuki SX4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2012: Vehicle has automatic four-wheel drive system that sends torque to front wheels under normal conditions. Electronically controlled multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear axle when wheel slip is detected. The all-wheel drive system constantly interacts with the VSA dynamic stabilization system and electric power steering to provide full vehicle control, good traction and maneuverability in all road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 24 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Swift, Suzuki Liana, Suzuki Vitara | Used also on Honda Accord | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki SX4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Suzuki SX4 2013 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality.
High engine timing chain lifetime.
Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur. Honda CR-V 2012 2.0 engine: This engine is sensitive to both fuel and oil quality. Using low-grade gasoline can quickly damage the catalytic converter and lead to premature failure of the oxygen sensors. Many Honda owners are annoyed ... More about Honda CR-V 2012 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Suzuki SX4 is smaller. Suzuki SX4 is 27 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki SX4 is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 589 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1269 litres | 1669 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Suzuki SX4 has 159 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 400 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki SX4 is 1.4 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Suzuki SX4 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`740 | 2`100 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Suzuki SX4 is better rated in child safety tests. The Suzuki SX4 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Suzuki SX4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda CR-V has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Suzuki SX4, so Suzuki SX4 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki SX4 has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |