Suzuki SX4 2013 vs Nissan Juke 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 156 NM | 157 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 11 seconds | |
| Suzuki SX4 and Nissan Juke have the same engine power, but Suzuki SX4 torque is 1 NM less than Nissan Juke. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
By specification Suzuki SX4 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke, which means that by driving the Suzuki SX4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Suzuki SX4 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 24 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Swift, Suzuki Liana, Suzuki Vitara | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Almera, Nissan Note, Nissan Micra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Suzuki SX4 2013 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality.
High engine timing chain lifetime.
Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur. Nissan Juke 2010 1.6 engine: A simple and reliable engine, not particularly demanding on fuel quality. Tends to consume more oil, may have problems starting in cold weather. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.57 m | |
| Suzuki SX4 is 17 cm longer than the Nissan Juke, width is practically the same , while the height of Suzuki SX4 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1269 litres | 830 litres | |
|
Suzuki SX4 has more luggage capacity. Suzuki SX4 has 179 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Juke. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki SX4 (by 439 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`740 | 1`645 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Suzuki SX4 scores higher in safety tests. The Suzuki SX4 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | low | |
| Suzuki SX4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 180 percent more cases than Suzuki SX4, so Suzuki SX4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki SX4 has
|
Nissan Juke has
| |