Suzuki SX4 2013 vs Nissan Qashqai 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 156 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki SX4 engine produces 33 HP less power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 164 NM less than Nissan Qashqai. Due to the lower power, Suzuki SX4 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Suzuki SX4 consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that by driving the Suzuki SX4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Suzuki SX4 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 23 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Swift, Suzuki Liana, Suzuki Vitara | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Nissan Qashqai engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.62 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Suzuki SX4 is 3 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki SX4 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1269 litres | 1513 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Suzuki SX4 has 20 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The Nissan Qashqai may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 244 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki SX4 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`740 | 2`085 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Suzuki SX4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 110 percent more cases than Suzuki SX4, so Suzuki SX4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki SX4 has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |