Suzuki SX4 2013 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 156 NM | 154 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Suzuki SX4 is more dynamic to drive. Suzuki SX4 and Mitsubishi ASX have the same engine power, but Suzuki SX4 torque is 2 NM more than Mitsubishi ASX. Suzuki SX4 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Suzuki SX4 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that by driving the Suzuki SX4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Suzuki SX4 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 1080 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 24 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Swift, Suzuki Liana, Suzuki Vitara | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki SX4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Suzuki SX4 2013 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality.
High engine timing chain lifetime.
Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.62 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Suzuki SX4 and Mitsubishi ASX are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 442 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1269 litres | 1219 litres | |
| Suzuki SX4 has 12 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki SX4 (by 50 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki SX4 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`740 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki SX4 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki SX4 has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |