Suzuki SX4 2013 vs Chevrolet Trax 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 156 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Trax is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki SX4 engine produces 23 HP less power than Chevrolet Trax, whereas torque is 44 NM less than Chevrolet Trax. Due to the lower power, Suzuki SX4 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki SX4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki SX4 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Trax, which means that by driving the Suzuki SX4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki SX4 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Trax. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 23 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Swift, Suzuki Liana, Suzuki Vitara | Used also on Chevrolet Cruze | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki SX4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Chevrolet Trax engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.67 m | |
| Suzuki SX4 is 5 cm longer than the Chevrolet Trax, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki SX4 is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 356 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1269 litres | no data | |
|
Suzuki SX4 has more luggage capacity. Suzuki SX4 has 74 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Trax. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki SX4 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Trax, which means Suzuki SX4 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`740 | 1`884 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Chevrolet Trax is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki SX4 has
|
Chevrolet Trax has
| |