Suzuki SX4 2016 vs Volvo V40 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Suzuki SX4 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo V40 can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.6 | 1.5 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 111 - 140 HP | 120 - 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 156 - 320 NM | 220 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 - 13 seconds | 6.3 - 10.5 seconds | |
| In general, Volvo V40 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Suzuki SX4. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 5.7 | 3.4 - 5.9 | |
|
Suzuki SX4 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo V40. On average, Suzuki SX4 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | 144 mm (5.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Suzuki SX4 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Suzuki SX4 is smaller, but higher. Suzuki SX4 is 7 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki SX4 is 15 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 335 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1269 litres | 1500 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Volvo V40 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V40 (by 231 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki SX4 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volvo V40, which means Suzuki SX4 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`753 kg | ~ 1`978 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`220 kg | ~ 1`499 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 533 kg | ~ 479 kg | |
| Suzuki SX4 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 10 procentiem more than Volvo V40. Therefore, Suzuki SX4 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 16 200 | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki SX4 has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |