Suzuki SX4 2010 vs Toyota Urban Cruiser 2008

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Suzuki SX4
2010 - 2014
Toyota Urban Cruiser
2008 - 2014
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Suzuki SX4 is available only with front wheel drive, while Toyota Urban Cruiser can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 1.6 - 1.9 (petrol, diesel)1.3 - 1.5 (petrol)

Performance

Power: 120 HP90 - 109 HP
Torque: 156 - 280 NM132 - 205 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.7 - 12.3 seconds11.7 - 12.7 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.2 - 7.24.6 - 6.0
Suzuki SX4 petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Urban Cruiser.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.15 m3.93 m
Width: 1.76 m1.73 m
Height: 1.58 m1.53 m
Suzuki SX4 is larger.
Suzuki SX4 is 22 cm longer than the Toyota Urban Cruiser, 3 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki SX4 is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 270 litres314 litres
Toyota Urban Cruiser has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Suzuki SX4 has 44 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Urban Cruiser. This could mean that the Suzuki SX4 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 10.6 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`697~ 1`553
Safety: no data
Quality:
average
no data
Average price (€): 38005400
Pros and Cons: Suzuki SX4 has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • lower price
Toyota Urban Cruiser has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • only petrol engines available
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv