Suzuki SX4 2013 vs Nissan Juke 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 | 1.5 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 - 120 HP | 110 - 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 156 - 320 NM | 150 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 - 13 seconds | 7.8 - 11.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 5.9 | 4.9 - 7.6 | |
|
Suzuki SX4 petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan Juke. On average, Suzuki SX4 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.58 m | 1.57 m | |
| Suzuki SX4 is 16 cm longer than the Nissan Juke, width is practically the same , while the height of Suzuki SX4 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1269 litres | 830 litres | |
|
Suzuki SX4 has more luggage capacity. Suzuki SX4 has 179 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Juke. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki SX4 (by 439 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki SX4 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Nissan Juke. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`790 | ~ 1`785 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Suzuki SX4 scores higher in safety tests. The Suzuki SX4 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki SX4 has
|
Nissan Juke has
| |