Suzuki SX4 2013 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 | 1.6 - 2.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 - 120 HP | 114 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 156 - 320 NM | 154 - 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 - 13 seconds | 10.2 - 13.1 seconds | |
| In general, Mitsubishi ASX are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Suzuki SX4. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 5.9 | 4.6 - 8.1 | |
|
Suzuki SX4 petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi ASX. On average, Suzuki SX4 equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.58 m | 1.62 m | |
| Suzuki SX4 and Mitsubishi ASX are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 442 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1269 litres | 1219 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`790 kg | ~ 2`005 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`185 kg | ~ 1`437 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 605 kg | ~ 568 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 10 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki SX4 has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |