Suzuki SX4 2013 vs Ford EcoSport 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 | 1.0 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 - 120 HP | 90 - 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 156 - 320 NM | 140 - 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 - 13 seconds | 11.5 - 14.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 5.9 | 4.4 - 8.3 | |
|
Suzuki SX4 petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford EcoSport. On average, Suzuki SX4 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford EcoSport. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.58 m | 1.66 m | |
| Suzuki SX4 is 6 cm longer than the Ford EcoSport, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki SX4 is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 333 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1269 litres | 1238 litres | |
|
Suzuki SX4 has more luggage capacity. Suzuki SX4 has 97 litres more trunk space than the Ford EcoSport. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki SX4 (by 31 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`790 | ~ 1`732 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Suzuki SX4 scores higher in safety tests. The Suzuki SX4 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 10 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki SX4 has
|
| |