Suzuki Liana 2002 vs Seat Toledo 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 144 NM | 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Seat Toledo is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Liana engine produces 7 HP less power than Seat Toledo, whereas torque is 91 NM less than Seat Toledo. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Liana reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 5.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 5.5 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Liana consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Liana could require 300 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Liana consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 1100 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Toledo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 24 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Swift, Suzuki SX4, Suzuki Vitara | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Audi A6, Seat Alhambra, Seat Leon | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Seat Toledo engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Suzuki Liana 2002 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality.
High engine timing chain lifetime.
Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Suzuki Liana is smaller, but higher. Suzuki Liana is 9 cm shorter than the Seat Toledo, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Liana is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Liana is 0.9 metres less than that of the Seat Toledo, which means Suzuki Liana can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`650 | 1`400 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Liana has
|
Seat Toledo has
| |