Suzuki Liana 2002 vs Kia RIO 1999

 
Suzuki Liana
2002 - 2004
Kia RIO
1999 - 2002
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 103 HP108 HP
Torque: 144 NM140 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds14.2 seconds
Suzuki Liana engine produces 5 HP less power than Kia RIO, but torque is 4 NM more than Kia RIO.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.78.7
The Suzuki Liana is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Suzuki Liana consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia RIO, which means that by driving the Suzuki Liana over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 640 km in combined cycle510 km in combined cycle
790 km on highway630 km on highway
Suzuki Liana gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Suzuki Liana 2002 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality. High engine timing chain lifetime. Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur.

Dimensions

Length: 4.35 m4.22 m
Width: 1.69 m1.68 m
Height: 1.54 m1.44 m
Suzuki Liana is larger.
Suzuki Liana is 13 cm longer than the Kia RIO, 1 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Liana is 10 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 480 litres261 litres
Suzuki Liana has more luggage capacity.
Suzuki Liana has 219 litres more trunk space than the Kia RIO.
Turning diameter: 10 meters9.4 meters
The turning circle of the Suzuki Liana is 0.6 metres more than that of the Kia RIO, which means Suzuki Liana can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`650no data
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 12001200
Pros and Cons: Suzuki Liana has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Kia RIO has
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv