Suzuki Liana 2002 vs Dodge Neon 2000
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 103 HP | 116 HP | |
Torque: | 144 NM | 157 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11 seconds | |
Suzuki Liana engine produces 13 HP less power than Dodge Neon, whereas torque is 13 NM less than Dodge Neon. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.4 | |
Suzuki Liana consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Neon, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Liana could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 47 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
790 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
Suzuki Liana 2002 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality.
High engine timing chain lifetime.
Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.35 m | 4.39 m | |
Width: | 1.69 m | 1.71 m | |
Height: | 1.54 m | 1.42 m | |
Suzuki Liana is smaller, but higher. Suzuki Liana is 4 cm shorter than the Dodge Neon, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Liana is 12 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 371 litres | |
Suzuki Liana has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Suzuki Liana has 109 litres more trunk space than the Dodge Neon. The Dodge Neon may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`650 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Liana has
|
Dodge Neon has
| |