Suzuki Liana 2004 vs Dacia Logan 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 106 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 144 NM | 112 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Liana is more dynamic to drive. Suzuki Liana engine produces 31 HP more power than Dacia Logan, whereas torque is 32 NM more than Dacia Logan. Thanks to more power Suzuki Liana reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Dacia Logan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Liana consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Logan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Liana could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Liana consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Logan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 24 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Swift, Suzuki SX4, Suzuki Vitara | Used also on Renault Kangoo | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Liana might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Suzuki Liana 2004 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality.
High engine timing chain lifetime.
Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.53 m | |
| Suzuki Liana is 10 cm longer than the Dacia Logan, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Liana is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 510 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`535 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Liana has
|
Dacia Logan has
| |