Suzuki Liana 2004 vs Alfa Romeo 156 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 275 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
| Suzuki Liana engine produces 25 HP less power than Alfa Romeo 156, whereas torque is 75 NM less than Alfa Romeo 156. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 5.8 | |
|
The Suzuki Liana is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Liana consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 156, which means that by driving the Suzuki Liana over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 1080 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| Alfa Romeo 156 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Suzuki Liana is smaller, but higher. Suzuki Liana is 9 cm shorter than the Alfa Romeo 156, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Liana is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 378 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Liana is 1.6 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo 156, which means Suzuki Liana can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`770 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Liana has
|
Alfa Romeo 156 has
| |