Suzuki Liana 2001 vs Nissan Almera 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 HP | 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 144 NM | 158 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Nissan Almera is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Liana engine produces 11 HP less power than Nissan Almera, whereas torque is 14 NM less than Nissan Almera. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Liana reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Liana is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Liana consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera, which means that by driving the Suzuki Liana over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Liana consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Almera gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 24 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Swift, Suzuki SX4, Suzuki Vitara | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan Primera, Nissan Almera Tino, Nissan Sentra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Liana might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Suzuki Liana 2001 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality.
High engine timing chain lifetime.
Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 4.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.45 m | |
| Suzuki Liana is 5 cm longer than the Nissan Almera, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Liana is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 348 litres | 355 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1062 litres | 1100 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Suzuki Liana has 7 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Almera. This could mean that the Suzuki Liana uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Almera (by 38 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Liana is 0.4 metres less than that of the Nissan Almera, which means Suzuki Liana can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`640 | 1`735 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Liana has
|
Nissan Almera has
| |