Suzuki Liana 2001 vs Nissan Almera 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 HP | 82 HP | |
| Torque: | 144 NM | 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 14.5 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Liana is more dynamic to drive. Suzuki Liana engine produces 21 HP more power than Nissan Almera, but torque is 41 NM less than Nissan Almera. Thanks to more power Suzuki Liana reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Almera is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Liana consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Liana could require 345 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Liana consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 1460 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 1070 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Almera gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 23 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Swift, Suzuki SX4, Suzuki Vitara | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Clio, Nissan Micra, Suzuki Jimny | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.45 m | |
| Suzuki Liana is 3 cm longer than the Nissan Almera, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Liana is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 348 litres | 355 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1062 litres | 1020 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Suzuki Liana has 7 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Almera. This could mean that the Suzuki Liana uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki Liana (by 42 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Liana is 0.4 metres less than that of the Nissan Almera, which means Suzuki Liana can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`640 | 1`735 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Liana has
|
Nissan Almera has
| |