Suzuki Liana 2001 vs Hyundai Matrix 2001
Body: | Hatchback | Minivan / MPV | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 HP | 103 HP | |
Torque: | 116 NM | 141 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
Hyundai Matrix is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Liana engine produces 13 HP less power than Hyundai Matrix, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Hyundai Matrix. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Liana reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 8.0 | |
The Suzuki Liana is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Liana consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Matrix, which means that by driving the Suzuki Liana over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
890 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
Suzuki Liana gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 19 years | 12 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Swift, Suzuki Wagon R+, Suzuki Ignis, Suzuki Jimny | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Hyundai Getz, Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO, Kia Cerato | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
The Hyundai Matrix engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.23 m | 4.02 m | |
Width: | 1.69 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.55 m | 1.64 m | |
Suzuki Liana is 21 cm longer than the Hyundai Matrix, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Liana is 9 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 348 litres | 350 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1062 litres | 1284 litres | |
Suzuki Liana has 2 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Matrix. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Matrix (by 222 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Suzuki Liana is 0.4 metres less than that of the Hyundai Matrix, which means Suzuki Liana can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`640 | 1`800 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Liana has
|
Hyundai Matrix has
| |